Kicksology.net, the study of phat kicks for your balling pleasure
last update: March 14, 2004








adidas a3 Superstar Ultra

AND 1 The Rise

AND 1 Chosen One

See all reviews








Home

The Reviews

In the Paint

The Kicks Log

       Most Recent Posts

       The Archives

       XML/RSS Feed

About this Site

Buy Kicksology Apparel






The only magazine on the planet dedicated to shoeheads, SoleCollector is a must for anyone with a love for athletic shoes. Every issue is chock-full-o photos of the hottest kicks, exclusive interviews, in-depth articles and reviews from Kicksology.net. You can take your chances at the newstands or subscribe today to lock in your issues!




The Kicks Log at Kicksology.net

~ From Wednesday, July 9 ~

From Way Out of Left Field...

comes the news that Nike has today "entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Converse, Inc., the globally recognized footwear brand with nearly a century of sports heritage."

That's right, Nike has bought Converse. It's not often that a deal on this scale happens out of the blue (the buying price is $305 million plus the assumption of some of Converse's debt), but I didn't hear even a hint of a rumor that this was going to go down beforehand.

Man, Nike has been spreading around the cabbage in a big way these days. The curious part is what the rationale for this deal is. Nike could have bought the rights to Converse for much less when the company went bankrupt a couple of years ago, so why now? Could it have something to do with spreading the wealth as far as their hoops endorsees goes? Rumor was that Nike made a bid for Fila a few months back in order to give Kobe a brand to front, so maybe this is plan B? Or maybe it's just a way to get further into the "lifestyle" space and counter up-and-comers like Puma? Who knows, but it'll be interesting to see what Nike does with the Converse brand.

The funny part is that this means Karl Malone will finally be, if only indirectly, a Nike athlete. And just in time for his move to LA. Hmmm, I smell a David Stern conspiracy theory brewing here.

39 Comments So Far ~ Post Your Own
shoefreek posted this at 5:46 PM - July 09, 2003

Dang.... what will nike do with converse?.. hopefully they keep some of the traditional shoes the same..

Silk posted this at 6:15 PM - July 09, 2003

since converse has that old-school appeal, i expect nike to come out w/ several old-school inspired shoes in the near future. a very strange move, but what has nike done that wasn't very successful.
P.S are you going to review the Converse (or should I say Nike) Weapons, Professor K?

Black posted this at 6:18 PM - July 09, 2003

Prof K,

Malone was sponsored by converse?

Did he wear the weapons?

Never a big follower of malone...

and 2 posted this at 6:25 PM - July 09, 2003

lakers and nike


now dats a tag - team...

Crude Oil Refiner posted this at 6:51 PM - July 09, 2003

think of the possibilities...

Zoom Purcells
Shox Weapon
Chuck SBs!!!

PDub posted this at 6:54 PM - July 09, 2003

I don't think Malone was sponsered, but it seems all he wore were the poopy converse team shoes they sold in Eastbay about 23 years ago. Stockton wore them too for a while then he wore some cheap Nike Flight shoes.

Weapons are very comfy shoes hopefully Nike doesn't corrupt the good Converse shoes......But hopefully they bring back the streetball CONS from the early 90's--gel packs, velcro straps, sorta like moon boots:D

E posted this at 6:54 PM - July 09, 2003

Nike hasn't ALWAYS made good moves (those on again off again Penny designs; Jason Kidd's Payton/Pippen ripoff; endorsing the "Worm"?!?!) but this seems to be a move that makes sense. Cons ol' Skool appeal is definately something that Nike is lacking and hopefully they can lend the guys at Beaverton some advice on making a nice casual-wear shoe (no more canvas VANS, skater ripoffs!). Could KOBE get his own line of casual wear? Stay tuned.

Sans posted this at 7:01 PM - July 09, 2003

Converse has some of the highest performance shoes out right now, #@&*, they don't. Does Nike really need to spend 350 million so they can put up a couple of uninspired old-school shoes.
Converse obviously wasn't a threat to them and have practically no game in todays market.
I don't see much high profile shoes commin out of this Converse deal. NIke is just throwing around money intimidating the other companie a bit. So I think they're making adidas and reebok sweat just a little bit more, and hey if you have 350 million laying around why not.

Prat posted this at 7:29 PM - July 09, 2003

I think that it would be cool to see Nike and Converse be one company, but then again, I hope Nike doesn't change the heritage and shoestyles of Converse shoes. Converse has been around for a very long time, and it should stay that way

About Karl going to L.A...
I think that it is great to have the Mailman on the Lakers squad and it will be a great lineup. Kobe, Shaq, Karl, Gary, and I guess Derek Fisher, but other than him its phenomenal.

tree posted this at 7:47 PM - July 09, 2003


converse is coming back with some of their old shoes and stuff. they were down but now they're on their way back up. its a good move by nike but one thing: isnt nike gonna be feeling the strain of popping down so much money in the past month?

Prat posted this at 7:47 PM - July 09, 2003

OOPS, I didnt mean to say Derek Fisher when I was talking about the starting line-up. My b about that, cause im guessing GP is gonna be the starting PG.

PDub posted this at 7:58 PM - July 09, 2003

Converse still has a lot of people buy their shoes though, because their casual shoes are all white, and clean looking, which ask K Swiss, you can make a crap shoe and make millions of dollars!

WC10 posted this at 8:12 PM - July 09, 2003

Nike: The Evil Empire of shoes.
I think Nike is trying to buy out competition--much like Microsoft is. Pretty soon we'll be seeing Nike buying out all the small brands like Avia, K-Swiss, Keds, etc. Lets hope the anti-trust laws break them up first.

And if they don't, Queen--I mean King James will be the end of Nike--after Lebron is bench warming in a season and getting paid $90 million, Nike will self-destruct.

Hows this for a headline:
"Worst Investment Ever--Nike's Lebron James deal is a Bust"

jimbo posted this at 8:14 PM - July 09, 2003

Nike has given Jordan almost an entire shoe company, and they feel the need to buy a shoe company that comes out with about 3 different shoes? They're just making themselves feel financially secure when they're already rolling in dough. Give me a break.

530's Own Balla posted this at 9:19 PM - July 09, 2003

Lets look at this- Nike already makes a reported 1.3 BILLION per year? They are obviously thinking long term. after all the debt converse put themselves into is paid off, they (nike) can make that 1.3 into 1.5 billion a year. Also, shoes are A. Getting more expensive, and B. Selling more and more and more units, if they really thought that they needed this boost (or thats what they think they are getting) they need to use some of that 1.3 bil to hire a good doctor to get that checked out.

Jerome posted this at 9:44 PM - July 09, 2003

I don't really like the Chucks, maybe some zoom air or a foamposite upper will change my mind. LOL Seriously though, Nike hasn't had a strong presence in the Retro shoe market. Maybe with the Chucks and the continued success of the AF1 and the Libretto, Nike will get to where they want to be, able to challenge the adidas superstar.

C-Nich posted this at 9:45 PM - July 09, 2003

It seems like Nike is just sweeping the athletic shoe industry by storm. They have all the major athletes in the NBA as well as many other major athletes in other areas.Now with the buying of converse they are expanding there horizon, and i am looking foward to what has to come of converse now. Maybe more advanced converse's will come about with better quality in the future.

main man posted this at 9:48 PM - July 09, 2003

well i have always loved converse just for being themselves, the dr. js that came out like 5-6 years ago were dynamic, Hopefully nike keeps the original stuff on the chucks instead of a swoosh to keep the heritage going. then i wouldnt mine because nike will make the show a better fit also and more comfortable

'Trix posted this at 11:28 PM - July 09, 2003

Yo Converse/Nike...don't trade nuttin 'till i snag a pair of Converse Weapons in royal/white!

'Trix posted this at 11:44 PM - July 09, 2003

also...maybe they will form something like adidas-Saloman....nike-Converse? sounds good...

Drew posted this at 11:58 PM - July 09, 2003

Now Nike can leave Converse to do with the retro crap. Honestly, I am quite sick and tired to see Nike putting its efforts in retro stuffs, while the designs and quality of its NEW stuffs are significantly going DOWN.

BigBen posted this at 12:13 AM - July 10, 2003

yeah for real, i gotta get some black patent weapons before they overhaul everything

Marcus posted this at 1:05 AM - July 10, 2003

With Nike gettin convrse they will have the casual shoe market on lock. They will improve the quality of converse shoes while improving on their own casual shoes. Can u imagen how much better a par of Chuck T's wil feel with Zoom Air or even dare i say Encapsulated Air? The only thing they have to watch out for is that they don't get too greedy and go after more small shoe companies cause the gov. will do them like they did microsoft. With Lebron gettn his own line and with Kobe gettin his own stuff, a smart move would to have Nike mess with the bball stuff and let converse give the shoes a lil clean lookin stlye to them and then let converse do their thing on the off court shoes. I see nuthin but positves with this move and hey if u got $300 + million just sittin there to spend, hey y not spend it.

Hareth posted this at 1:44 AM - July 10, 2003

I thought Converse had put out the Converse 4th quarter (or something like that) and they looked good, I donīt know if they performed well, and there were also the weapons, which are beautiful and have LOTS of personality. Probably they werenīt selling well. Maybe itīs better that nike buys converse than for them to dissappear, it would be quite sad.

jun2 posted this at 3:40 AM - July 10, 2003

they should make a commercial with dennis rodman again..

Hareth posted this at 10:18 AM - July 10, 2003

Sorry, I checked and the name was Converse timeout (not bad looking).

jbv1 posted this at 10:29 AM - July 10, 2003

SIGH...

If only they would bring back the Larry Johnson "Grandmama" commercials...

ooga booog posted this at 11:30 AM - July 10, 2003

First, somebody said lebron will be on the bench. That is stupid, cause cavs fans pay to see him. Also, great retro kicks come from converse and i hope that continues

Zep posted this at 12:28 PM - July 10, 2003

One of the main reasons that Nike bought Converse is because last year Converse bought the patent to the name "King James".

301 posted this at 1:14 PM - July 10, 2003

Man I was so excited when I read this. Nike is taking over. Everyone who said Nike is lacking in the retro department need to shut up and put on the Dunks or the Force 1 or the Force Max. I just need to go get the Monochrome Chucks before they put Shox on it and they suddenly cost 80 bucks (they gotta get the 305 mil back some way).

Italy posted this at 2:01 PM - July 10, 2003

GREAT MOVE BY NIKE

O/C posted this at 2:25 PM - July 10, 2003

You can't "patent" a name. Furthermore, "King James" has been in common usage long enough (think bible), that any attempts to enforce a trademark or copyright would be futile.

Anyways, I definately think that it was a no brainer for Nike. Even though Converse will be run as a wholey owned subsidary of Nike, it gives Nike a stronger retro presence. The timing is helped with the recent strong "rebellious" sales (aka the Strokes and Avril markets).

Erix posted this at 6:45 PM - July 10, 2003

Maybe Nike will start a "reto" style with their kicks. And we all know how much a retro freak Kobe is. Honestly, I think it would look ugly. One more thing: what technologies would Nike incorporate into their kicks from Converse?

James Martin posted this at 6:51 PM - July 10, 2003

This is a great move.

1.To touch some things up, a year ago Converse got the trademark for using King James on shoes and clothing. But since then dropped the idea of using the trademark. I am sure they were just gonna sell it to Nike and make some money off of it but this is so much better.

2. Last season Karl Malone, Andre Miller, Ron Mercer, and Rodney Rogers were endorsed by Converse.

3. Nike will never ever put Air or Shox on the chucks. That would be like putting 3 strips on the Air Force 1's.

4. Nike should let Converse have some of their endorsers to help build back up the Performance BBall shoes. ex Melo

5. Nike should bring back Converse Helium and make some killa running shoes.

daniel mimes posted this at 2:00 PM - October 01, 2003

my shoes ugly

lilmomma posted this at 3:05 PM - December 17, 2003

i think that converses wouldve done betteron their own!!!!!!

fucknut002 posted this at 3:16 AM - January 11, 2004

i think this #@&* sucks, i just want a picture of #@&*ing grandmama. #@&* you #@&*%!#s, i'm sick of this #@&*.

Tameka posted this at 7:44 PM - January 28, 2004

I think they should come out with baby blue and black converse

jeannette makanda posted this at 11:05 PM - February 14, 2004

im look for job

Add Your Own Comment
Your Name:
What Do You Think?:
  





This Month's Guest

Most Active Posts




Copyright © 2000 - 2004, Kicksology.net, LLC. All rights reserved.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the terms of use